Should Big Auction Houses be Allowed to Pay Buyers to Place Bids?

KatherineUncategorizedLeave a Comment

Buying at art auctions

The practice of paying buyers to bid on art auction lots has created a somewhat uneven playing field. It’s not so much the practice itself that is troublesome, as buyers are seeing their fees reduced as a result. It is the inherent lack of transparency which puts other bidders, those not in the know, at a disadvantage.

This story was published by Bloomberg.com on June 10, 2014.

Sotheby’s Is Paying Buyers to Bid on Its Artwork

  • Auctioneer pays fee to buyers who agreed to bid at sale
  • Company aims to transfer risk from art sales it guarantees
Sotheby’s was in a bind. The auction house had won several top consignments for its bellwether spring auction, including a Jean-Michel Basquiat that sold for $7.4 million four years ago, by guaranteeing the sellers minimum prices.But as volatile financial markets sent jitters through the art world, Sotheby’s faced the prospect of owning the work if it failed to sell. In the weeks leading up to its May 11 auction, the company began pitching a new perk to potential buyers: a fixed fee to those who agree, before the auction even starts, to make at least a minimum bid. The new incentive helped Sotheby’s find buyers for guaranteed pieces.

Sotheby’s change “makes them more competitive on the financial side with Christie’s,” said Thomas C. Danziger, a partner in Danziger, Danziger & Muro LLP. “In the current climate, every advantage that you can have helps the bottom line. Stupid money is not flowing in the ways it might have 12 to 18 months ago.” Sotheby’s declined to comment for this story.

bloomberg graph

Click to Enlarge

The new perk in Sotheby’s arsenal of incentives, disclosed in catalogs in April, sweetens the deal for investors who agree to step in as buyers of last resort. In the past, so-called irrevocable bidders were compensated with a part of the auction house’s sales commission only if another buyer purchased the artwork that they had backed. Now, by opting for a fixed fee, they are guaranteed a payout and can get the artwork effectively at discount.

‘Onion Gum’

The new approach reduces the risk that Sotheby’s ends up with too much artwork in its inventory — a concern particularly in a slowing market. But as the May 11 auction showed, the company can still lose money.

“Onion Gum” was one of four works in that sale consigned by hedge fund manager Daniel Sundheim. Sotheby’s gave him undisclosed guaranteed prices for the paintings, and in the weeks before the auction, it lined up irrevocable bidders for the four pieces.

The Basquiat sold for $6.6 million, net of the fee paid to the mystery buyer, who was the only bidder. That was less than the guarantee to Sundheim, according to a person familiar with the matter, leaving Sotheby’s with a loss on the painting.

Transparency Concerns

Sotheby’s lists the price net of fees paid to such buyers, making it possible to estimate the fee that the company doesn’t disclose. The buyer of the Basquiat work received $258,000, based on Sotheby’s standard sales commission.

The company argues this form of disclosure is more transparent, because the fee paid to the irrevocable bidder works like a discount. Christie’s does not adjust for such fees in its reporting of final prices.

Christie’s declined to comment. The fees are “a separate transaction to the sale, reflecting the risk the third party has taken in relation to the minimum price guarantee,” the company says on its website.

Sotheby’s is offering the new incentive to investors after it took a loss on a $509 million guarantee on the collection of its former chairman A. Alfred Taubman and had to take possession of $33 million of unsold artworks last year.

Like ‘Steroids’

Auction guarantees have proliferated since the financial crisis, covering half of the $2.1 billion of art in November’s semi-annual auctions in New York. Since then, the number of guarantees at Sotheby’s and Christie’s has fallen as the market slowed. Art adviser Todd Levin says guarantees act like “steroids” in the market by presetting bids often at artificially high levels.

David Nash, a co-owner of Mitchell-Innes & Nash gallery in New York, says irrevocable bids are part of financial machinations that distort the art market. When highly valued works with prearranged bids come up for auction, in many cases there is no genuine bidding and they are bought by the guarantors, he said.

That’s what happened with Roy Lichtenstein’s “Nurse,” which was purchased in November at Christie’s for $95.4 million — an auction record for the artist that was 70 percent higher than the previous high two years earlier.

“It’s a sale agreed in private to take place in public and pretend it’s an auction,” said Nash.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *